Home
Search results “International law principles”
International Law explained by Hesham Elrafei |  What are the sources of International Law?
 
02:36
What are the sources of International public law? Le droit international expliqué | Quelles sont les sources du droit international? By Hesham Elrafei https://www.linkedin.com/in/heshamelrafei Overview of the sources of international public law as stated in Article 38 of the international court of justice ICJ statute : treaty, customary law, courts decisions, jurisprudence and law principles. Sources of International Law , explained , simplified and visualized. Les sources du droit international public مصادر القانون الدولي وفقال لمادة 38 من النظام الأساسي لمحكمة العدل الدولية 1 What are the sources of international law? 2 The term ‘source of law’ refer to legal rules governing the international community. 3 Unlike national laws , where sources of law are specified in a norm superior to laws and regulations, usually a constitution, no such norm exists in international law. 4 The International Court of Justice, stipulated a catalogue of sources of international law, which is used when deciding legal disputes submitted before the world court. 5 the first source is international treaties, whether a general or particular treaty, a bilateral ,regional or multinational one, 6 a treaty is a binding international agreement. by which the countries are obliged to observe their contractual obligations. 7 the 2nd source is customary law. At the outset, international law was mainly constituted by customs. 8 which is by its nature, universal, whereas treaty law binds the parties to these treaties only 9 International custom consists of 2 elements: First is State practice, which means What generally States Do and Say. 10 Oppinio Juris is the 2nd element of customary law. It means that the state practice, has to be accepted as law, by the other states. 11 In addition to treaties and customs, other sources exist, such as Judicial decisions , juristic writings and general principles of law. 12 while they are not formal sources , they can still play an important role as an evidence of the law.
Views: 152607 Hesham Elrafei
Sources of International law
 
03:11
According to article 38 of Statute of the International Court of Justice there are five sources of international law. 1. Treaties 2. Customs 3. General Principles of law 4. Judicial Decisions 5. Juristic works
Views: 86112 LAW Notes
Jurisdiction of States explained | International Law | Lex Animata  | Hesham Elrafei
 
02:52
States jurisdiction in international law : concept, types and examples. By Hesham Elrafei https://www.linkedin.com/in/heshamelrafei State jurisdiction, reflects the international law general principles , of state sovereignty, equality of states , and non-interference in other states domestic affairs, and it means that a government and its courts , have general power to exercise authority, over all persons and things, within its territorial boundaries , however, there must be a link , between the individual , the offence and the state court exercising jurisdiction over that person. while it's primarily territorial, jurisdiction of states may be based on other grounds, like national security , and citizenship of the victim or the offender, however , the enforcement of such jurisdiction, is restricted by territorial factors. State jurisdiction, reflects the international law general principles , of state sovereignty, equality of states , and non-interference in other states domestic affairs. and it means that a government and its courts , have general power to exercise authority, over all persons and things, within its territorial boundaries , in relation to civil and criminal matters. however, there must be a link , between the individual , the offence , and the state court exercising jurisdiction over that person. while it's primarily territorial, jurisdiction of states may be based on other grounds, like national security , and citizenship of the victim or the offender, however , the enforcement of such jurisdiction, is restricted by territorial factors the first base of jurisdiction, is the territorial principle , and it means that the local court power, is geographically restricted, within the borders of that state. However, As one offence may take place in more than one single country, the territorial jurisdiction is divided into 2 categories, subjective and objective. the subjective principle, is exercised by the state in which the offence is started , while the objective principle, is exercised by the state in which the offence is completed. For example, a fraud can be committed by someone in ireland, against another in england. or a shooting incident , can take place on the borders of two countries, on the other hand, the state power is not absolute within its territory , as certain persons, like diplomats. are immune, from the local courts jurisdiction, the nationality of the parties, is the second ground for state jurisdiction, as a state can exercise its jurisdiction, beyond its territory ( boundaries ) , regardless where the person is located, subject that the offender or the victim ( the passive personality ) is a national of the claimant country. The 3rd ground is the protective or security principle, and it allows a State , to exercise jurisdiction over foreigners, outside its territory , regardless of their citizenship , when there is a threat to its national security. And lastly, the universality principle , is the fourth ground for state jurisdiction, and it allows any state , to punish certain international offences abroad , like piracy, slavery , torture , crimes against humanity and genocide, whether committed by or against foreign nationals.
Views: 48789 Hesham Elrafei
Principles of International Law I Justice Jawad Hassan I Key-note Address
 
45:38
Justice Jawad Hassan is the sitting judge of Lahore High Court having expertise on Public and Private International Law.
Views: 598 Qanoondan
International Law Explained
 
04:37
The depth and breadth of international law. Kal Raustiala: I think international law is one of these things that's a little bit like the air where it's everywhere. We don't really notice it so when you get on a plane and you fly to Europe the ability to get on that plane, cross over the air space of other countries, sometimes you see the little map when you're in the plane that shows you're crossing over Greenland or whatever, all of that is governed by international law in different ways. Different treaties are in place to take care of all the questions that might arise about aviation. So that's a really mundane example and then at the other extreme we've got much more contentious examples like--  Let's take the war in Iraq. So as most of us remember in the run up to the war the Bush administration went to the security council at the United Nations and tried to get a second resolution, and they're doing that because there is a legal framework in place that governs the ability of countries to enter in to armed conflict. So between those two bookends a zillion other examples but I think the thing to recognize about international law is in a globalized world, in an integrated world, you are constantly dealing with things that are crossing borders or you're crossing borders and international law is usually playing some role in shaping that. Question: What dictates international law?the most common thing are treaties and most of us are familiar with--  I mentioned aviation. There are treaties governing that. The UN itself was created by a treaty. So treaties are kind of the backbone a little bit like we think of statutes in the domestic context, but we do have something like common law. We call it customary law so a good example would be the law of the sea. There's all kinds of rules about ships and their ability to go on the high seas and who can board and where they can cross. Most of that is governed by custom and the idea is this custom kind of a cruise over time like the common law becomes entrenched and accepted as law, and then there is also courts. Right. So we have--  The International Court of Justice sits in The Hague and we've got a series of other courts. Right. The World Trade Organization has a court and so forth. So there is a set of judicial institutions much like in our domestic system so in a lot of ways it's a very similar system. There isn't I suppose a constitutional equivalent. There isn't a kind of grand governing thing but there are literally tens of thousands of treaties so a surprising amount of topics are covered.Question: Who are the governing bodies?There are a whole set of international organizations so from the United Nations being the most broad, the most elaborated, probably the most famous. The World Trade Organization is a little more specialized and then you've got dozens and dozens and dozens, thousands probably, of these subsidiary international organizations, international maritime organization dealing with law of the sea questions and so on down the line. And these have been created over the years. Some of them date back to the nineteenth century but for the most part that's a kind of twentieth-century phenomenon so one of the things we see in the last century or so has been one, the rise of these international organizations, the UN being the paramount example, and two, the use of treaties. Treaties existed in the past but when we talked about custom and common law that was much more common. Now we tend to codify that in to treaty. So those two things are sort of two major trends of the last century.Question: How will globalization affect international law?in the sense that you can have a treaty for example in which every country is a member of that treaty and so would be governed by that, and in fact we have lots of treaties that are pretty close to what you've got in virtually every single country. The Convention on the Rights of the Child I think is a good example where only the United States and Somalia when I last checked were not parties to that treaty. The United Nations Charter comes pretty close. Right. So virtually every country--  Switzerland for a long time was a holdout. Virtually every country is part of the UN system and so governed by the rules of the UN Charter so there is no barrier to that and we do see it.
Views: 107921 Big Think
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW
 
02:24
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/youtube/ -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
Views: 2781 Sam Life
Principles of State Jurisdiction and International Criminal Law
 
16:28
Presented by Dr Douglas Guilfoyle
Views: 1513 djaguilfoyle
CLN4Ue Virtual Lesson 5.1 - Principles of International Law
 
19:20
CLN4Ue Virtual Lesson 5.1 - Principles of International Law
Views: 910 Scott Lewis
How Maritime Law Works
 
06:27
Support Wendover Productions on Patreon: https://www.Patreon.com/WendoverProductions Maritime law is confusing, but interesting (I hope.) Last Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PsmkAxVHdM Twitter: http://www.Twitter.com/WendoverPro Email: [email protected] Attributions: South China Sea video courtesy youtube.com/militarytiger (Creative Commons License) Cruise Ship icon by Rohan Gupta from the Noun Project Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness Map by Alinor (Creative Commons License) Old Cruise Ship photo courtesy Roger W from Flickr (Creative Commons License) Foreign Coders photo courtesy Cory Doctorow from Flickr (Creative Commons License)
Views: 2651192 Wendover Productions
Jus Cogens , Peremptory norms explained | Lex Animata | Hesham Elrafei
 
02:20
What is Jus Cogens ( Peremptory norms ) ? By Hesham Elrafei https://www.linkedin.com/in/heshamelrafei This animation video visualize and simply the concept of Jus Cogens in International law as per the Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969, the video examines the following in terms of : definition and meaning of the term, origin in the roman law ( JUS STRICTUM & JUS DISPOSITIVUM ) , example of jus cogens norms ( genocide , crimes against humanity , slavery trade , torture, use of force, piracy , violation of human rights etc ) and the legal effect of an agreement violating a jus cogens norm: void.
Views: 61960 Hesham Elrafei
Sources of International Law
 
11:05
Description- This video covers Main Sources of International law- International Conventions International Customs General Principles of Law Decisions of Judicial and Arbitral Tribunals Juristic Works Decision or determination of the Organ of International Organizations Other Sources: International Comity States Papers Decision or Instruction of States to its Officers/Diplomats Reasons ( Logic) Equity & Justice
Views: 1554 Sisodia Educator
Public International Law: An Introduction - Part 1
 
20:20
Public International Law: An Introduction - Part 1: the nature, sources and subjects of international law. This series of videos follows the structure of the subjects treated in textbook 'Internationaal Publiekrecht in vogelvlucht' by Kooijmans et al. (Deventer, 2008) and so is suitable for students who use this textbook, but draws its information from a vast array of open, freely accessible sources (Wikipedia included). While I take great care to avoid factual errors in my presentations, anything said in these videos should not be taken at face value, but rather you should use these videos to support your understanding of the material.
Views: 29991 Global Solidarity
Intervention : International Law
 
04:50
Intervention Intervention is dictatorial interference by a state in affairs of another state. Intervention, in principle is prohibited by international law. But it does not prohibit intervention in all circumstances. Intervention can be diplomatic or military. Grounds for intervention – 1. Self-preservation- This is valid ground for a long time. The use of force in self-defense is justified only when it is necessary for self-preservation. 2. Gounds of humanitarian- There are lots of cases in which intervention on humanitarian Grounds was made. UN permits intervention on the ground of violation of human rights. But action must be taken by UN and not by any individual state. 3. To enforce treaty right – It was valid ground in past. UN charter does not recognize it valid. 4. Balance of power- It creates International tension. It is condemned by Jurists. UN Charter says it is invalid ground. 5. Protection of Person and Property- Protection of Person and Property in foreign state is no more valid ground. 6. Collective intervention- Collective intervention means intervention by United Nations. Security Council can take decision in order to maintain International peace and security. For example Security Council took action against Korea in 1950 and Congo in 1961. 7. Intervention in civil war- Generally it is not allowed. But if war is of such magnitude that it is threat to International peace and security then allowed.
Views: 26955 LAW Notes
State Jurisdiction in International Law
 
25:19
What is State Jurisdiction ? State jurisdiction is the capacity of a State under International Law to prescribe and enforce the rules of law. Types of State Jurisdiction Basis of State Jurisdiction Principles of Jurisdiction Immunity from Jurisdiction
Views: 6590 CSS TV
General Principles of Law and International Due Process
 
01:10:06
Charles Kotuby counsels both private clients and sovereign states in complex global disputes. His U.S.-based practice is focused on government regulation and federal appeals. He has authored briefs in more than a dozen cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and has argued cases concerning federal statutory and constitutional issues before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits. Mr. Kotuby’s global practice is focused on international litigation, commercial and investment arbitration. He has counseled clients in both common and civil law systems, and frequently deals with novel issues of public and private international law. Mr. Kotuby has appeared as counsel in international matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union, and before ICSID and UNCITRAL tribunals. He regularly advises energy and mining clients on investment protections in Latin America, Africa, Southeast and Central Asia, and on maritime issues under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Luke Sobota was previously a partner in the Global Disputes practice group of a leading international law firm. Highlights of his work at Three Crowns include leading the firm’s work for Chevron in its international dispute with Ecuador, including in the pending $9.5 billion UNCITRAL treaty arbitration. Mr. Sobota has also been spearheading a multi-billion-dollar contractual arbitration before the ICC in New York, and has been actively involved in several ICSID investor-state arbitrations involving claims of breach of contract, expropriation, and denial of justice. He also has been advising two sovereign clients on issues of public international law concerning border disputes. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he advised and prepared formal legal opinions for executive branch officials on a range of constitutional, international, and administrative law issues. He has successfully argued cases in U.S. appellate courts and briefed several cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. He teaches a course on global sovereign disputes at American University and is currently writing a monograph on general principles of international law for Oxford University Press. He earned his law degree from the University of Chicago Law School, after which he clerked for the late Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William H. Rehnquist.
Sources of international law in commercial contracts
 
04:03
This video has been made by DealGull - The international business community. All rights reserved.
Views: 2224 DealGull Videos
1 - International Law and Human Rights
 
05:44
International law is the set of rules, agreements and treaties that are binding between countries. When sovereign states enter into agreements that are binding and enforceable, it’s called international law or international legal system. It is horizontal in nature because all States are equal in nature. International laws promote peace, justice, common interests and trade. International laws apply to governments. It’s up to each state government to implement and follow international laws. A country’s laws apply to citizens and other people that are present in the country. However, it’s up to the country’s governing authority to apply international law and keep their agreements with the other countries that are involved. Therefore domestic legal system is said to be vertical in nature because its the state machinery that governs the individuals What comes to your mind when you think of international law? It is simply the set of rules, agreements and treaties that are binding between countries. When sovereign states enter into agreements that are binding and enforceable, it’s called international law or international legal system. It is horizontal in nature because all States are equal in nature. This means that the law applies to all nations equally. So what are the functions of international law? International laws promote peace, justice, common interests and trade. International laws apply to governments. It’s up to each state government to implement and follow international laws. In contrast a country’s laws apply to citizens and other people that are present in the country. However, it’s up to the country’s governing authority to apply international law and keep their agreements with other countries. International law generally comes from five sources given in the article 38 of ICJ Statute: treaties, customs, general principles of law, judicial decisions of ICJ and academic writings. Treaties are express agreements that countries enter into voluntarily. They’re written agreements. They are considered a more modern and deliberate method of law-creation. There are many writers who feel that treaties are most important source of international law as the expressed consent of the state must be taken before it is applied. The entire system of international law is based on consent. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 calls for interpretation of treaties based on the plain language of the words in the treaties. The context of the words and the presumption of good faith and good intentions can also play a role in interpreting a treaty. Customs are common practices between countries. They’re common practices that are so expected and consistent that countries operate with the belief that the custom is legally required and binding. Examples of customary law are the prohibitions of a state using or condoning genocide or slavery. Generally, as long as a state doesn’t object to a customary law, it applies to that state. General principles of law are rules of law that develop over time. Principles of law are an understanding of how the law should work based on past rulings. In addition to looking at past rulings, international courts can also look to judicial opinions for help identifying and interpreting international law. The judicial decisions of ICJ are also a source of law though it is subsidiary in nature. The general assembly of UN has the right to ask an advisory opinion from ICJ therefore Court is quite authoritative as far as law-making and the status of the law is concerned. Finally the writings of international academics are also considered subsidiary source of international law as they have a direct impact on customary international law. Until recently international law took no notice of individuals. It used to be a system that only operate between states and governs this interstate relationship. It was generally unconcerned with what states inside its boundaries. The idea of human rights emerged stronger after World War II. Governments then committed themselves to establishing the United Nations, with the primary goal of maintaining international peace and security. People wanted to ensure that never again would anyone be unjustly denied life, freedom, food, shelter, and nationality. Member states of the United Nations pledged to promote respect for the human rights of all. To advance this goal, the UN established a Commission on Human Rights and charged it with the task of drafting a document spelling out the meaning of the fundamental rights and freedoms proclaimed in the Charter. The Commission, guided by Eleanor Roosevelt’s forceful leadership, captured the world’s attention. On December 10, 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the 56 members of the United Nations. With the goal of establishing mechanisms for enforcing the UDHR, the UN Commission on Human Rights proceeded to draft two treaties:
IHL and Humanitarian Principles
 
01:12:50
IHL and Humanitarian principles The Advanced IHL Learning Series are addressed to lecturers and trainers who wish to update their knowledge of the latest developments and challenges in international humanitarian law (IHL) and other related areas. They enable lecturers to update and deepen their expertise in topical issues, have access to teaching resources and introduce the topics in their course or training. What are the respective aims of IHL and the humanitarian principles? What are their sources? Who are they addressed to? Does IHL refer to the principles? What is the normative framework governing relief operations? How can the principles help foster respect for IHL? This Advanced IHL Learning Series provides lecturers with a wide range of resources to understand and teach these issues. For more information please visit: https://www.icrc.org/en/ihl-and-humanitarian-principles
International Law Principles in the XXI Century: a Time to Take Stock of Them?
 
02:05:11
The speakers discussed whether the classic principles of international law remain current today and how their substance has change or should change looking at specific examples of these principles’ application. Moderator: Khristofor Ivanyan, Managing Partner, Ivanyan & Partners law firm
Views: 34 SpbLegalForum
What is INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW? What does INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW mean?
 
06:29
✪✪✪✪✪ WORK FROM HOME! Looking for WORKERS for simple Internet data entry JOBS. $15-20 per hour. SIGN UP here - http://jobs.theaudiopedia.com ✪✪✪✪✪ ✪✪✪✪✪ The Audiopedia Android application, INSTALL NOW - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.wTheAudiopedia_8069473 ✪✪✪✪✪ What is INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW? What does INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW mean? INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW meaning - INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW definition - INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. International Trade Law includes the appropriate rules and customs for handling trade between countries. However, it is also used in legal writings as trade between private sectors, which is not right. This branch of law is now an independent field of study as most governments have become part of the world trade, as members of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Since the transaction between private sectors of different countries is an important part of the WTO activities, this latter branch of law is now a very important part of the academic works and is under study in many universities across the world. International trade law should be distinguished from the broader field of international economic law. The latter could be said to encompass not only WTO law, but also law governing the international monetary system and currency regulation, as well as the law of international development. The body of rules for transnational trade in the 21st century derives from medieval commercial laws called the lex mercatoria and lex maritima — respectively, "the law for merchants on land" and "the law for merchants on sea." Modern trade law (extending beyond bilateral treaties) began shortly after the Second World War, with the negotiation of a multilateral treaty to deal with trade in goods: the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). International trade law is based on theories of economic liberalism developed in Europe and later the United States from the 18th century onwards. International Trade Law is an aggregate of legal rules of “international legislation” and new lex mercatoria, regulating relations in international trade. “International legislation” – international treaties and acts of international intergovernmental organizations regulating relations in international trade. lex mercatoria - "the law for merchants on land". Alok Narayan defines "lex mercatoria" as "any law relating to businesses" which was criticised by Professor Julius Stone. and lex maritima - "the law for merchants on sea. Alok in his recent article criticised this definition to be "too narrow" and "merely-creative". Professor Dodd and Professor Malcolm Shaw of Leeds University supported this proposition. In 1995, the World Trade Organization, a formal international organization to regulate trade, was established. It is the most important development in the history of international trade law. The purposes and structure of the organization is governed by the Agreement Establishing The World Trade Organization, also known as the "Marrakesh Agreement". It does not specify the actual rules that govern international trade in specific areas. These are found in separate treaties, annexed to the Marrakesh Agreement. Scope of WTO : (a) provide framework for administration and implementation of agreements; (b) forum for further negotiations; (c) trade policy review mechanism;and (d) promote greater coherence among members economics policies Principles of the WTO: (a) principle of non-discrimination (most-favoured-nation treatment obligation and the national treatment obligation) (b) market access (reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade) (c) balancing trade liberalisation and other societal interests (d) harmonisation of national regulation (TRIPS agreement, TBT agreement, SPS agreement) The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade(GATT) has been the backbone of international trade law since 1948 after the charter for international trade had been agreed upon in Havana. It contains rules relating to "unfair" trading practices — dumping and subsidies. Many things impacted GATT like the Uruguay Round and the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Views: 9898 The Audiopedia
Bus162: Principles of International Law.
 
02:46
Bus162, Chapter 2, Tanvi Kothari, sjsu, business, international management, international Principles of Law
Views: 22 Patrick Burns
Basic principles of law
 
29:36
A beginners guide to understanding law. Based on university level law books. Helpful to those about to embark on a law career.
Views: 26522 Bill Turner
Principles of Environmental Law
 
31:13
Subject : Law Paper: Environmental Law Content writer : Ms. Lovleen Bhullar
Views: 19432 Vidya-mitra
Rules of war (in a nutshell)
 
04:44
Yes, even wars have laws. To find out more, visit http://therulesofwar.org ******** Rules of War in a Nutshell - script Since the beginning, humans have resorted to violence as a way to settle disagreements. Yet through the ages, people from around the world have tried to limit the brutality of war. It was this humanitarian spirit that led to the First Geneva Convention of 1864,and to the birth of modern International Humanitarian Law. Setting the basic limits on how wars can be fought, these universal laws of war protect those not fighting, as well as those no longer able to. To do this, a distinction must always be made between who or what may be attacked, and who or what must be spared and protected. - CIVILIANS - Most importantly, civilians can never be targeted. To do so is a war crime. “When they drove into our village, they shouted that they were going to kill everyone. I was so scared, I ran to hide in the bush. I heard my mother screaming. I thought I would never see her again.” Every possible care must be taken to avoid harming civilians or destroying things essential for their survival. They have a right to receive the help they need. - DETAINEES - “The conditions prisoners lived in never used to bother me. People like him were the reason my brother was dead. He was the enemy and was nothing to me. But then I realized that behind bars, he was out of action and no longer a threat to me or my family.” The laws of war prohibit torture and other ill-treatment of detainees, whatever their past. They must be given food and water and allowed to communicate with loved ones. This preserves their dignity and keeps them alive. - SICK & WOUNDED - Medical workers save lives, sometimes in the most dangerous conditions. “Several fighters from both sides had been critically wounded in a fierce battle and we were taking them to the closest hospital. At a checkpoint, a soldier threatened us, demanding that we only treat his men. Time was running out and I was afraid they were all going to die.” Medical workers must always be allowed to do their job and the Red Cross or Red Crescent must not be attacked. The sick or wounded have a right to be cared for, regardless of whose side they are on. - LIMITS TO WARFARE - Advances in weapons technology has meant that the rules of war have also had to adapt. Because some weapons and methods of warfare don't distinguish between fighters and civilians, limits on their use have been agreed. In the future, wars may be fought with fully autonomous robots. But will such robots ever have the ability to distinguish between a military target and someone who must never be attacked? No matter how sophisticated weapons become it is essential that they are in line with the rules of war. International Humanitarian Law is all about making choices that preserve a minimum of human dignity in times of war, and makes sure that living together again is possible once the last bullet has been shot.
Lavrov: Another Provocation! Ukraine Violated Key Principles of International Law in Narrow Strait
 
01:10
Subscribe to Vesti News https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa8MaD6gQscto_Nq1i49iew?sub_confirmation=1 Another opinion that Ukraine must respect Russia's sovereignty was expressed by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. He called the situation in the Kerch Strait a definite provocation. He believes Kiev violated the key principles of international law. Previously, it was reported that the Acting Ambassador of Ukraine to Russia would be summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry.
Views: 4113 Vesti News
What is TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE? What does TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE mean? TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE meaning
 
01:49
What is TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE? What does TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE mean? TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE meaning - TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE definition - TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ The territorial principle (also territoriality principle) is a principle of public international law under which a sovereign state can prosecute criminal offences that are committed within its borders. The principle also bars states from exercising jurisdiction beyond their borders, unless they have jurisdiction under other principles such as the principle of nationality, the passive personality principle, the protective principle, and possibly universal jurisdiction. The Lotus case was a key court ruling on the territoriality principle. In 1926, a French vessel collided with a Turkish vessel, causing the death of several Turkish nationals. The Permanent Court of International Justice ruled that Turkey had jurisdiction to try the French naval lieutenant for criminal negligence, even though the incident happened beyond Turkey's boundaries. This case extended the territoriality principle to cover cases that happen outside a state's boundaries, but have a substantial effect on the state's interests or involve its citizens. Questions have surfaced regarding how the territoriality principle applies, with the rise of globalization and the Internet. The applicability of this principle also was in question, with the case against Augusto Pinochet and other cases of transnational justice.
Views: 1053 The Audiopedia
Sources of International Law Lecture 4
 
18:34
Article 38 of ICJ International convention International customs General principles of law recognized by civilized Nations. Judicial decisions/juristic works. Ex aequo et Bono. Decisions and determinations of organs of international institutions. Opinio juris sive necessitatis. Usages. International Rules of Comity. State papers. State guidance for their officers. Reasons. Equity and justice. Case laws. West Rand Central Gold Mining Company Ltd vs R 1905. Portugal vs India 1960. Mavrommatis Palestine Concession Case 1964. Temple of Preah vihear 1962. Barcelona Traction Case 1964. R vs. Keyn 1876 Paquete Havana case 1900.
Professor Gillian Triggs on International Law: Contemporary Principles and Practice
 
00:44
Professor Gillian Triggs discusses 'International Law: Contemporary Principles and Practice', second edition. Gillian Triggs is the author of 'International Law: Contemporary Practice and Principles', which provides comprehensive coverage of contemporary cases in international law, including essential sources, treaties, jurisdiction, personality, territory, law of the sea, state responsibility and sovereign immunity, as well as coverage of specialised topics, such as international environmental law, human rights and the rules of the World Trade Organization. Professor Triggs is the Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Sydney, and holds the Challis Chair in International Law. For more information on this LexisNexis publication, please visit: http://bit.ly/qwacCr Stay in touch with the latest legal industry updates, whitepapers, research and special offers via our Twitter feed: http://twitter.com/LexisNexisAUS or visit our Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/lexisnexisaustralia
Views: 359 LexisNexisAustralia
ILD 2012 | Panel Discussion: General Principles of International Law
 
01:00:15
International Law Conference, U.S. Naval War College June 25-27, 2012 Panel discussion on the "General Principles of International Law" Moderator: Capt. Kevin Kelly, U.S. Naval War College Panelists: - Professor Wolff Heìntschel von Heìnegg, Europa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt - Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC, Legal Policy International Ltd. - Professor Robert Chesney, University of Texas (Video courtesy of the International Law Department) ***** The views expressed are the speakers' own and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Naval War College, the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other branch or agency of the U.S. Government.
Views: 1285 usnavalwarcollege
What is INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW? What does INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW mean?
 
04:06
✪✪✪✪✪ WANT VIDEO LIKE THIS ONE? ORDER IT HERE FROM INDUSTRY EXPERTS - http://bit.ly/2Uxpg5X ✪✪✪✪✪ ✪✪✪✪✪ The Audiopedia Android application, INSTALL NOW - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.wTheAudiopedia_8069473 ✪✪✪✪✪ What is INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW? What does INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW mean? INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW meaning - INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW definition -INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. International humanitarian law (IHL) is the law that regulates the conduct of war (jus in bello). It is that branch of international law which seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting persons who are not participating in hostilities, and by restricting and regulating the means and methods of warfare available to combatants. IHL is inspired by considerations of humanity and the mitigation of human suffering. "It comprises a set of rules, established by treaty or custom, that seeks to protect persons and property/objects that are (or may be) affected by armed conflict and limits the rights of parties to a conflict to use methods and means of warfare of their choice". It includes "the Geneva Conventions and the Hague Conventions, as well as subsequent treaties, case law, and customary international law." It defines the conduct and responsibilities of belligerent nations, neutral nations, and individuals engaged in warfare, in relation to each other and to protected persons, usually meaning non-combatants. It is designed to balance humanitarian concerns and military necessity, and subjects warfare to the rule of law by limiting its destructive effect and mitigating human suffering. Serious violations of international humanitarian law are called war crimes. International humanitarian law, jus in bello, regulates the conduct of forces when engaged in war or armed conflict. It is distinct from jus ad bellum which regulates the conduct of engaging in war or armed conflict and includes crimes against peace and of war of aggression. Together the jus in bello and jus ad bellum comprise the two strands of the laws of war governing all aspects of international armed conflicts. The law is mandatory for nations bound by the appropriate treaties. There are also other customary unwritten rules of war, many of which were explored at the Nuremberg War Trials. By extension, they also define both the permissive rights of these powers as well as prohibitions on their conduct when dealing with irregular forces and non-signatories. International humanitarian law operates on a strict division between rules applicable in international armed conflict and internal armed conflict. This dichotomy is widely criticized. The relationship between international human rights law and international humanitarian law is disputed among international law scholars. This discussion forms part of a larger discussion on fragmentation of international law. While pluralist scholars conceive international human rights law as being distinct from international humanitarian law, proponents of the constitutionalist approach regard the latter as a subset of the former. In a nutshell, those who favors separate, self-contained regimes emphasize the differences in applicability; international humanitarian law applies only during armed conflict. On the other hand, a more systemic perspective explains that international humanitarian law represents a function of international human rights law; it includes general norms that apply to everyone at all time as well as specialized norms which apply to certain situations such as armed conflict and military occupation (i.e., IHL) or to certain groups of people including refugees (e.g., the 1951 Refugee Convention), children (the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child), and prisoners of war (the 1949 Third Geneva Convention).
Views: 16846 The Audiopedia
International humanitarian law: a universal code
 
13:46
Is international humanitarian law up to the job of protecting the people affected by modern-day armed conflicts? This film looks in turns at the poor security conditions frequently confronting the civilian population, the fact that people often have to flee their homes, hostage-taking, the dangers posed by cluster munitions, and the work of preventing and, punishing war crimes. It tells us the basic rules of the law and reminds us that respecting them is everyone's responsibility. http://www.icrc.org
Private International Law
 
03:15
-- Created using PowToon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/youtube/ -- Create animated videos and animated presentations for free. PowToon is a free tool that allows you to develop cool animated clips and animated presentations for your website, office meeting, sales pitch, nonprofit fundraiser, product launch, video resume, or anything else you could use an animated explainer video. PowToon's animation templates help you create animated presentations and animated explainer videos from scratch. Anyone can produce awesome animations quickly with PowToon, without the cost or hassle other professional animation services require.
Views: 742 Indah Pusfita
2. Principles & Strategies in Environmental Law
 
50:21
Environmental Politics and Law (EVST 255) The United States' fragmented, piecemeal approach to environmental law is presented through the cases that led to the creation of major environmental statutes such as the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The variety of federal agencies and levels of government that participate in creating and implementing regulation contribute to the fragmentation of American environmental law. Environmental law seeks to balance the costs of environmental degradation with the economic benefits that companies reap. However, the uncertainty of environmental costs leads to a slow and ineffective regulation process. 00:00 - Chapter 1. A Course About Defining and Solving Problems 04:09 - Chapter 2. The US's Fragmented Approach to Environmental Law 09:22 - Chapter 3. The Central Questions of Environmental Law 30:08 - Chapter 4. A Society with Elaborate Environmental Law 37:33 - Chapter 5. Overview of Cases for the Course Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://open.yale.edu/courses This course was recorded in Spring 2010.
Views: 35736 YaleCourses
EXTRADITION  ; Rule of Specialty ; DOUBLE CRIMINALITY
 
16:28
A brief description of EXTRADITION , RULE of Specialty & Double CRIMINALITY.
Panel II: Procedural Principles of International Water Law
 
01:20:33
Panel II: Procedural Principles of International Water Law and the Resolution of Transboundary Freshwater Disputes - Chair: Prof. Jutta Brunnée (University of Toronto) - Speakers: Prof. Attila Tanzi (University of Bologna), Prof. Owen McIntyre (University College Cork), Judge Awn Al-Khasawneh (Doughty Street Chambers) More information: www.mpi.lu/news-and-events/latest-news/detail/detail/international-conference-a-bridge-over-troubled-waters-dispute-resolution-in-the-law-of-internati/
The Humanitarian Principles
 
02:10
The EU is committed to promoting global respect and compliance with International Humanitarian Law, together with the Humanitarian Principles – humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence. These help protect the lives of humanitarian workers and ensure safe and unhindered access to those in need. Read more: http://bit.ly/1bJIr0G Video by the European Union
What is LOTUS CASE? What does LOTUS CASE mean? LOTUS CASE meaning, definition & explanation
 
02:30
What is LOTUS CASE? What does LOTUS CASE mean? LOTUS CASE meaning - LOTUS CASE definition - LOTUS CASE explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ The Lotus case concerns a criminal trial which was the result of the 2 August 1926 collision between the S.S. Lotus, a French steamship (or steamer), and the S.S. Boz-Kourt, a Turkish steamer, in a region just north of Mytilene (Greece). As a result of the accident, eight Turkish nationals aboard the Boz-Kourt drowned when the vessel was torn apart by the Lotus. On 7 September 1927 the case was presented before the Permanent Court of International Justice, the judicial branch of the League of Nations, the predecessor of the United Nations. The issue at stake was Turkey's jurisdiction to try Monsieur Demons, the French lieutenant on watch duty at the time of the collision. Since the collision occurred on the high seas, France claimed that the state whose flag the vessel flew had exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. France proffered case law, through which it attempted to show at least state practice in support of its position. However, those cases involved ships that both flew the flag of the same state. The Court, therefore, rejected France's position stating that there was no rule to that effect in international law. The Lotus principle or Lotus approach, usually considered a foundation of international law, says that sovereign states may act in any way they wish so long as they do not contravene an explicit prohibition. The application of this principle – an outgrowth of the Lotus case – to future incidents raising the issue of jurisdiction over people on the high seas was changed by article 11 of the 1958 High Seas Convention. The convention, held in Geneva, laid emphasis on the fact that only the flag state or the state of which the alleged offender was a national had jurisdiction over sailors regarding incidents occurring in high seas. The principle has also been used in arguments against the reasons of the United States of America for opposing the existence of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Views: 6239 The Audiopedia

Skype for dell laptop windows 7
Aspect windows doors conservatories
Windows 8 extend display
C710 acer windows 10
Garage sale windows equivalent